Download free ebook : A_Short_Course_in_Digital_Photography.pdf
Free downloadable ebook on Photography Tutorial

What's happened is that both cameras and photographic processes have become easier and more convenient. Digital cameras are just another step along this path. Images captured with these cameras are admittedly different, but you'd be hard pressed to prove they are inferior. Many of the arguments you hear today about digital cameras are but echoes of the sentiments expressed when the 35mm Leica was introduced in 1925. Suddenly there was a camera that was easy to handle in the most difficult situations and with a long roll of motion picture film, capable of capturing one image after another. It may have used a much smaller negative, and hence been "inferior," but photographers who held onto their big, awkward box cameras were soon bypassed by history.

Another argument against digital cameras is that they are mainly of the point and shoot variety. That means they are fully automatic and don't have the controls that photographers have traditionally used to get great photos. This implies they are used for vacation pictures or photographs are taken as documents of family events. However, there is a certain elitism and snobbishness about this point of view. In general, the photographer brings more to a great photograph than the camera does. The history of photography is replete with stories about photographers who didn't know or care much about cameras. Jaques Henri Lartigue was getting great images before he was 10 years old--and with an old box camera to boot. It's said that Dorthea Lange (or was it Margaret Borke White) used the printed instructions that came with her film to set her camera's setting--"bright sun 1/125 at f/16, cloudy bright 1/125 at f/11, and so on."